This is an ongoing issue that can be ended by Sen. Obama in about 30 seconds in a press conference. Given Sen. Obama’s lack of truthfulness and outright dishonestly in his personal and political dealings, is this really the hope and change America has been looking for?
Tomorrow the Electoral College will vote for our next president.
On the eve of this historic vote, consider the following. AND please listen to our conversation with attorney Gary Kreep on our radio program on Nov. 26th, and with attorneys Orly Taitz, and Leo Donofrio, all of whom have filed suits petitioning the courts to force Obama to produce proof that he is indeed qualified to be president under the clear terms of our Constitution.
Barack Obama has NOT produced a vaulted copy of his original birth certificate – which in Hawaii is known as a ‘Certificate of Live Birth.’ (Refer to the image below on the right).
What Obama released and what appears on his ‘Fight the Smears’ website is a ‘Certification of Live Birth.’ (Refer to the image below on the left.)
Of course, the mere fact that the terms are so close—’Certificate’ and ‘Certification’—can only work to the advantage of those who want to perpetrate a deception.
Obama’s Certification of Live Birth
Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth
As should be readily apparent, the Certification (which Obama supplied) and the Certificate (which Obama has thus far refused to release) are very different documents. The Certification of Live Birth—also called a ‘short form’—contains limited information and is typically printed when an individual makes a requests it.
The Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth—on the other hand—contains information that can be easily and readily investigated—information that could immediately answer one of the main questions surrounding Obama’s constitutional eligibility.
We would know the name of the hospital or facility (we presently do not), where Obama was born and the name of the attending physician or midwife. Following-up on that kind of clear-cut information could put the controversy to rest.
Then again, changes to the original certificate would also be apparent. And, if that were the case, it could be a problem for Obama. Reasonable people would first ask WHY changes were made and IF the changes were legitimate.
Discrepancies between an individual’s original birth certificate and the certification of live birth could exist for a variety of reasons—legitimate, erroneous or even fraudulent.
For example, Hawaii Revised Statutes S.338-15, S.338-16, S.338-17, S.338-17.5 and S.338-17.7 actually address the circumstances under which an individual can amend his or her birth certificate (although admittedly, Hawaii is hardly unusual in that regard).
A more modern statute that has gotten a lot of attention on the blogosphere is S.338.17.8 which sets vague standards for the issuance of birth certificates to children not even born in Hawaii.
Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
If such a practice is codified in Hawaii today, we can only guess at what was going on back in 1961! Such a liberal environment certainly places the possession of a Hawaii birth certificate by someone not born in the United States within the realm of possibility!
Now we’re not jumping to any conclusions.
The problem is that we DO NOT know.
The same can’t be said of those who are spreading malicious distortions.
Apparently, a simple acknowledgement that such a thing is within the realm of possibility, and a request to the man who wants to be the leader of the free world to do something very simple so the possibility of a Constitutional crisis—no matter how remote—can be avoided makes one a ‘conspiracy theorist.’
All Obama need do is release his original birth certificate.
It can’t be that difficult!
If President-elect Obama is unwilling or unable to prove that he is constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President of the United States then every action he takes as President is open to legal challenge.
Our first priority is to compel him to prove he is eligible before he is inaugurated, but we must prepare now to challenge his actions on all fronts.
That means, when President Obama attempts to impose the so-called Fairness Doctrine, we’ll be there to challenge it in court. When he signs a bill to force homosexual marriage on every state, we’ll be there to challenge it. With your help, we will fight every action this usurper president takes.
Far too many of our so-called ‘conservative’ leaders are already showing the American people that they will choose political gain over the Constitution. Someone must be willing to fight and be ready to fight. Someone needs to take the lead.
‘Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law breaker, it breeds contempt for the law, it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.’-Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Olmstead v. U.S.
How could it be happening? It’s undeniable. In the past several days, malicious attacks have increased significantly against our efforts to demand that the Electoral College confirm once and for all President-elect Barack Obama’s eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.
Some prominent conservatives have already chosen what they mistakenly believe will be political gain over the Constitution. It wouldn’t be the first time. In fact, such behavior seems to be the rule—not the exception—these days.
In what constitutes one of the most sublimely ridiculous pills the American people are expected to swallow, we’re being told that Obama has produced his birth certificate when, in fact, he has—and still is—actively resisted producing his birth certificate.
That means we can’t depend upon these ‘leaders’ to protect our rights. Our only and best hope is for grassroots folks like you to take the bull by the horns and demand that the Constitution be followed.
We’re ready to fight the lies and distortions, but we can’t do it alone.
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a nonprofit public interest, legal action organization and has been your conservative voice in the courts since 1979. And since USJF is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, your generous assistance is also tax-deductible.
Isn’t defending the Constitution and the integrity of our electoral process worth a tax-deductible effort of $5000 or $2500 or even $100 or $50 or $25?
The Obama campaign has a crack team of three high-priced law firms – that’s not three lawyers but three law firms – that will use every means that money can buy to fight this action. We’re relying patriotic Americans like you.
Please click here to make your best TAX-DEDUCTIBLE effort to take part in this battle and support the vital mission of USJF.
In His Service,
Gary Kreep, Executive Director
United States Justice Foundation
(Via The Radio Patriot.)
TOMORROW THE ELECTORS VOTE AND STILL WE DO NOT KNOW (DO YOU TRUST HIM?)